EF-S – designed specifically for EOS cameras with APS-C cameras. In some cameras, putting an EF-S lens on a full-frame or film EOS camera will damage the camera’s mirror. EF-M – designed for Canon’s M-series compact mirrorless cameras. They cannot be used on other EF-mount cameras. FD – This was Canon’s old manual-focus lens mount
By "Canon M" I assume you mean "EF-M". Those are the lenses for Canon's EOS M series mirrorless cameras. And yes, they're only usable on EOS M cameras.
\n \n\ncanon ef ef s ef m difference
The main question here is if we know if future APS-C mirrorless from Canon (i.e. the upcoming M50 upgrade) will feature an RF mount or continue with the EF-M mount. Canon's made no mention of this. M can use all EF-M, and EF/EF-s with adapter. R can use all RF, and EF/EF-S with adapter. Until Canon says different, I'd expect this to continue. The Canon EF-S lens mount is a derivative of the EF lens mount created for some Canon digital single-lens reflex cameras with APS-C sized image sensors. It was released in 2003. Cameras with the EF-S mount are backward compatible with the EF lenses and, as such, have a flange focal distance of 44.0 mm.

Canon and Sony prices are comparable for similar quality but Sony does have far more lower-end lenses, plus third-party lenses. Both systems adapt EF lenses well (use the Sigma MC-11 for Sony). Canon has some unique RF lenses that might push you to them. The 70-200 f2.8 is VERY compact.

\n\n \n\n \n canon ef ef s ef m difference

This Lens Mount Adapter from Viltrox is designed to allow a Canon EF or EF-S-mount lens to be used with a Canon EF-M mount camera with full electronic communication. The underside of this adapter's detachable tripod foot is tapped with a 1/4"-20 accessory thread, providing direct attachment to tripods or quick release plates that feature 1/4"-20 mounts.

nzrailmaps. • 5 mo. ago. EF lenses are probably cheaper because from competition from various manufacturers. At the moment, officially, only Canon is producing RF lenses, on the grounds of their patent rights. 1. MortgagePlayful6087. • 5 mo. ago. All of my lenses are ef and they take wonderful photos for me. EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM vs l. I have an r7 with an ef adapter, wondering is the extra 300 gbp worth it (buying used) Thanks. Seconding this OP, I've got the II, and went for it after a lot of research that it's the sweet-spot of price/performance between the I, II and III. Yes, optically it's a decent improvement over the Mk I version and
I'm sure Canon will eventually fill those with excellent lenses, but for the time being an EF or EF-S lens might serve. For example, there is not yet a truly ultrawide lens for the APS-C R-series cameras. Maybe some day Canon will modify the excellent EF-M 11-22mm to fit and work on the new mount. But in the meantime we still have choice of
bp9Yc.
  • arz6qhl1bs.pages.dev/256
  • arz6qhl1bs.pages.dev/391
  • arz6qhl1bs.pages.dev/163
  • arz6qhl1bs.pages.dev/453
  • arz6qhl1bs.pages.dev/31
  • arz6qhl1bs.pages.dev/117
  • arz6qhl1bs.pages.dev/65
  • arz6qhl1bs.pages.dev/313

    • canon ef ef s ef m difference